What should we focus on next?
MindMup is community driven, so we’ll work on what our users want the most. For best results, please:
- Formulate ideas as work objectives (explain why, not just what/how). For example, ‘collaborate with friends remotely’ is much better than asking for ‘google realtime v2.0 integration’
- Do not submit stuff anonymously. We want to discuss your proposal with you if it gets votes, and anonymous submissions don’t allow us to do that. Ideas submitted anonymously will most likely be closed.
780 results found
-
Search and replace
Please implement search and replace, maybe with to variations: in subject headers and in notes text.
4 votes -
Search and replace
Please implement search and replace, maybe with to variations: in subject headers and in notes text.
3 votes -
Allow us to show links across trees in top down maps.
Top-down maps are great. But I would like to be able to show co-dependencies across trees.
At the moment the only way to show links between nodes in different branches of different trees is the straight-line arrow. It would be great to to be able to bring together node connections that have a different hierarchical origin.
1 vote -
More Fonts
I'm currently disappointed with the limited amount of fonts available on MindMup, and I want to have a much richer selection of fonts. I'd like to see fonts like Courier New, Special Elite, Times New Roman, etc.
4 votes -
Replace Shift+Space shortcut (change color) with another shortcut
Hi,
I've been loving the mind-mup app so far but I've been finding the change color shortcut slightly annoying, since it's often that I use shift+space to start writing a proper name or a new sentence.
0 votes -
Share map with a google group
Some companies manage team permissions through google groups. It would be great to be able to share view/edit permissions with a whole google group, and have these permissions updated as the google group changes.
3 votes -
Download as Storyboard in word INCLUDING hierarchical numbers
The function Download as Storyboard in word is already great! If it could include the numbers-view, so that the titels in word are already for example hierarchical defined the way we see it in mindmup, the work with mindmup would become even more effectiv. Or is it already possible and I don´t know this yet?
3 votes -
Default should be arrows going up
I love the new arrow function and the high-impact argument visualization. But I think the default option is that the arrows go up, not down. The arrows are supposed to indicate the direction of support. So, premise P supports a conclusion C if P gives us a reason to believe C, which means that the direction of rational support goes from the premise to the conclusion. Hence, the arrow should point from the premise to the conclusion. This is how argument mapping has traditionally been done, at least, for many years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map
1 vote -
Search
Search within a plex (a node and its descendants). Currently a search returns a limited number of hits and may not show the one I'm loking for. Freemind searches start searching with a node and its descendants which is very flexible. Also, make it easier to see the target node aS the dots around the node are difficult to spot in a large MUP.
7 votes -
title field
Having the option of a titel field were you could insert information like: participents, version number, version history and dates, company name.
When exporting to PDF you can select it to be a header.3 votes -
PLEASE make it so that free users can look back at their own maps.
I recently spent about an hour making a mind map for school. I saved it, copied the link, and turned it in. Now the link doesn't work and I can't look through my old maps and get it back. Why would I ever spend money on a website that just deletes my work?
3 votes -
1 vote
-
2 votes
-
Ability to resize image by dragging
I would love to be able to quickly change the size of an image node by dragging the corners. Having to manually change the size by typing in the amount of pixels is a bit too time consuming, especially when one is working with a lot of images.
12 votes -
Automatic argument weighing
Add an automatically calculated weight number that can be represented by either numbers or thinner/thicker lines in that each reason makes the parent argument stronger by 1 point and each objection makes it weaker by 1 point. The sum is then added to the level above and so on, up to the root. The functionality this brings is, when the root is a question, negative numbers will mean a negative answer and positive numbers will mean a positive one. It's a way to make argument maps into decision maps automatically.
4 votes -
Remember setting for "Label nodes for measurement"
It appears that showing measurement values on nodes is something that has to be enabled each time that a map is opened. Would be great if it could be toggled on as a property of the document so that the information was always displayed (especially to non-authors with whom the document is being shared!).
3 votes -
Add more location for data hosting
Add more location for data hosting.
So far only us-east-1 region. It's a problem for many European company. It could be nice to other location.3 votes -
Allow links to files on user's hard drive
One great feature of Freemind that is missing from Mindmup is the ability drag files from Windows explorer into an mm map and links to the files are automatically created as nodes. Can be a single file or a whole folder. Clicking on the links, opens the files. This is the only feature I have found missing from Mindmup that I use regularly with Freemind.
3 votes -
Enable subscript en superscript for text in nodes
X^2 has to be typed likes this instead of superscript.
7 votes -
Ability to select a subtree of an existing mind map and create a new map out of it
For now managed this by selecting a subtree, doing a copy, asking to start a new map and pasting. Would be nice to just select the subtree and have Mindmup take a 'start new mindmap request'.
Also, there seems to be a bug - when I select a subtree and paste it onto a new one, it shows multiple cross linkages over and beyond the original one.1 vote
- Don't see your idea?