Skip to content

Zac Gray

My feedback

12 results found

  1. 6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zac Gray commented  · 

    This looks similar to the suggestion at http://mindmup.uservoice.com/forums/200447-what-should-we-focus-on-next/suggestions/5442028-have-an-option-to-inhibit-status-propagation-to-pa
    I would find this feature useful, not only for having a sub-section of tasks affected by progress Status without affecting higher sections, but for marking nodes as an easily-applied 'status', as in using a configured format, without tracking and propagating as "task progress"

    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
  3. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zac Gray commented  · 

    I'm collaborating on a project with other team members in a mindmap. We tried using the Progress extension to easily format nodes as different statuses, not necessarily progress, since it makes pre-configured formats easy to use. But, the way statuses propagate makes the feature useless to us since we're not dealing with progress of 'tasks'. Could you add a feature to statuses that makes them non-propagating or otherwise ignored for progress status, such as when Priority of a status is left blank?

  4. 314 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zac Gray commented  · 

    What 'need' I feel this would fix, is that I have a very widely branching mindmap that I jump around in, with others that I'm collaborating with. After about 5 nodes, that go 4 or 5 levels deep, MindMup arranges them vertically so they span 2 or 3 whole screens - making it hard to browse them. It would be easier to navigate if they could be spread out in different directions than only "branching left (or right) away from center"

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zac Gray commented  · 

    I read that we can do shift+ctrl to "manually position" nodes, but they're still restricted to the same direction from the root node.

    Another idea that might be feasible is other layout options like radial, or up-down positioning.

  5. 57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 130 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    hi,

    you can create an outline now by doing file→export to local disk→text (or html). the text export creates a tab separated outline, which you can load easily in excel. the html outline creates a doc that you can load in a browser or with word/similar text editors.

    How is the proposal different from the current feature?

    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
  7. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Zac Gray commented  · 

    I have the same issue; I'm using MindMup for collaborating on a private project and would prefer to /not/ make our documentation public while still having git's version-control.

  8. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. 57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 51 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
  11. 72 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Zac Gray supported this idea  · 
  12. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

Feedback and Knowledge Base