Guillaume Berche
My feedback
7 results found
-
1 vote
thanks for letting us know. it should already work to set the oauth scopes when saving, but we’ll investigate
Guillaume Berche shared this idea · -
56 votesGuillaume Berche supported this idea ·
-
16 votesGuillaume Berche shared this idea ·
-
17 votes
we have the concept of attachments – where you an add lots of rich text stuff including tabular info. (http://blog.mindmup.com/p/working-with-attachments.html)
What would you get with table nodes that current attachment support doesn’t give you?
Guillaume Berche supported this idea · -
151 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Guillaume Berche commentedSee similar template library in mindmeister http://www.mindmeister.com/blog/2011/12/09/introducing-map-templates/
An error occurred while saving the comment Guillaume Berche commentedSharing maps is particularly interesting for templates or samples of innovating practices.
As a temporary workaround for a built-in feature within MindMup, please use the following google spreadsheet in which the community can add/rate/search public maps and even be notified by email of modifications made by the community:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvRQz82RzSUndElUd19XUHdIbGtrUXVMNEZ1YlRNQlE&usp=sharing
Guillaume Berche shared this idea · -
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Guillaume Berche commentedWould impact map metrics be a good candidate for attributes, with an associated display ? It feels having subnodes for metrics is kind of overkill.
If one indeed wants to have individual metric as a subnode, then attributes such as "target, limit, current might" factor out those among metrics nodes
This could be used during the drawing of impact maps to group actors, impacts and delivrables.
Freely positionned text would enable separare metrics table (as on impact mapping book p57)