Ability to filter which nodes are visible
Ability to filter which nodes are visible - based on status - eg don't show complete, or only show completed, or only show status > 10 etc
I would argue that without this feature the system has no meaning for us as a project tool. It is useful to get ideas out of your head, but to actually action them requires filters.
This is an Extremely useful feature in FreeMind / FreePlane that I miss very much when I migrated to MindMup.
Anatoly Yakubov commented
Even without #tags it will be of great help.
Filter by color (todo: red - today, yellow - this week, green - this month) would be nice option in filter dialog as well.
This is a huge feature for me from MindJet. It allows you to brainstorm and then tag nodes and filter your map based on "Phase 1", "Prospects", or whatever. Very useful!
Sam Noertker commented
I would also like to add tags to a node and then be able to filter based on those tags. For instance, say I am storing research and I have various sources. I could tag each node with the given source and then filter based on the tags to see all nodes from a given source.
Tommaso Sartor commented
I would like to have the possibility to filter node visibility not only by progress status but also by custom tag/label. Using custom status would be quite the same, but with a easy way to add custom tags to nodes (ex. keyboard short cuts ) should be better for my typical use.
Yes! My nodes can get pretty big. It would be great if there is a way to make the nodes smaller. On Microsoft Word, for instance, you can make text boxes smaller by dragging them to the desired size. It would be phenomenal if I could choose the size of my nodes rather than the default which has a node as big as the many texts in the nodes and that displays all the texts. Please update.
Robert Orzanna commented
I am totally up for this as well.
* Show only `Blocked` nodes
It could be implemented next to the labels in the `Progress` menu. There could be a button or check box next to each label to only show the respective one.
Heidi van Schaik commented
so you mean as an enhancement to the progress extension? This is a great idea; I'll just see if I can scrounge up another vote or two...